October 8, 2018
The Times of Chester County
The battle for the 160th: meet the candidates
PA HOUSE DISTRICT 160 – With less than a month until Election Day, the race in the 160th district is shaping up to be a battle for the ages: The Son of Darby vs. The Kid from Kennett. The veteran vs. the rookie. Goliath vs. David.
Incumbent Stephen Barrar (R), who became the representative for the Pennsylvania House of Representatives’ 160th District in 1996, is facing off against newcomer Anton Andrew (D), an attorney and non-profit founder who resides in Kennett Square.
Each of the candidates were asked their opinions about state and national issues, as well as each other:
What motivated you to run in this race?
Barrar: “There’s a couple of reasons. Part of it is, I chair the committee on veterans affairs. There’s a crisis in Pennsylvania that deals with first responders and there’s pending legislation that I’d like to get through before I retire. Also, I have the best office staff in the state of Pennsylvania. They do a good job, and we do constituent work that benefits the residents of the 160th.”
Andrew: “When I became aware of how gerrymandered our district was, which our incumbent and his cronies are responsible for, that was the straw that broke the camel’s back. Voters, many of them who looked like me, were pushed out of the district.”
How would you describe your opponent?
Barrar: “I don’t know him. I think I’ve met him once since he got involved in the race. I’ve never really talked with him other than a family day event in Chichester. Everything else about him I’ve read on his website. I think his ideology certainly leads to the left.”
Barrar added, “I always say, there’s not a darn thing I can give you for free, somebody’s gotta pay for it. I believe my opponent would vote to raise taxes, and I’ve spent my career fighting against it.”
Andrew: “When you’re out of touch with the consensus across party lines, it’s dangerous extremism. And I think that he (Barrar) has earned the title. 80% of voters in this district, regardless of party, oppose assault rifles. His stance is completely out of touch with reality. It’s an existential threat to democracy when you start casting out some voters and choosing other voters. You’ve basically silenced the voice of those voters.”
What is the most important issue to you in the race for this seat?
Barrar: “Property taxes are the one issue that comes up in every single election. We need to find a more fair way to fund education, which has been a goal since I was a young man. We haven’t been able to push through a property tax plan that is fair to everyone.”
Andrew: “Strengthening public education, investing in local infrastructure and the community, all of those are important issues. But the major structural problem is when you have leaders who aren’t accountable to the voters who put them in office.”
Andrew added, “Public education is the great equalizer in society. My parents came here when I was 10 so my sister and I could have the best possible education. Now people can’t move into the district because the state doesn’t pay its fair share. When someone sees their property tax and school tax bill, they can say ‘Thanks, Steve Barrar.’”
If you could change one thing about how the Pennsylvania state government is run, what would it be?
Barrar: “There’s a lot of things I would change. I believe that one of the things is to limit our leadership to 8-year term limits. When people tie those positions up for too long, they block out suggestions of others’ ideas, and they’re not as receptive to change.”
Barrar also noted that limiting terms to eight years could help avoid the type of corruption that has happened among both Republicans and Democrats. “I think if you’re doing a good job, people will vote to keep you in office,” he said, noting that voters are much more aware what their elected officials are doing because of social media.
Andrew: “I would change making it easier for people to access the record of their elected official. Making it more accessible so that you don’t have to search for it, that it’s there for you. Greater transparency and making people aware of the positions that their leaders take.” Andrew cited the recent fair district legislation and the last-minute changes made to it, which Barrar supported, as an example of non-transparency in the House of Representatives.
What is your position on the legalization of marijuana for recreational use in Pennsylvania?
Barrar: “I’m very torn on it right now. If there was a bill right now, I would vote against it.”
Andrew: “I believe in the decriminalization of small, personal use amounts of marijuana.”
Do you have any comment on the confirmation hearing for Brett Kavanaugh’s U.S. Supreme Court nomination, or the related FBI investigation?
Barrar: “I hadn’t thought much about it. As a state rep, I don’t have any say about it. I think for (U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein) to hold that information was disgraceful. I think that the Democrats are afraid that he’s going to overturn Roe v. Wade and other statutes that they depend on. It paints a sad picture of what’s going on in Washington, and I think it turns a lot people off about the political process.”
Andrew: “For the good of our nation, we need to protect the integrity of the Supreme Court by making sure that only those judges of the highest caliber, who have earned the respect of all the American people, are appointed to this lifetime position. I believe we need to challenge the idea that men, particularly men in power, can prey on women and get away with it. On a personal level, I will do whatever I can to help create the America that I want for my 10-year old daughter.” Source
Dec 12, 2017
Pa. lawmakers send Wolf abortion restrictions he plans to veto
Pennsylvania’s House on Tuesday voted after an impassioned debate to send a bill limiting abortions to the first 20 weeks of pregnancy to Gov. Tom Wolf, who immediately repeated his threat to veto it.
The Republican-controlled House voted 121-70 for the legislation that would alter the existing 24-week limit.
The measure would keep in place exceptions under current law for when a mother’s life is at risk, or if she could suffer a serious, permanent injury without an abortion. It does not allow exceptions for rape, incest or fetal abnormalities.
Supporters said medical advances mean premature fetuses are now able to survive at an earlier point in the pregnancy than previously possible.
The strong feelings and stark language that characterizes the abortion discussion on the national level were reflected in the House debate.
“As people try to frame this debate in terms of women’s rights, the question that begs to be asked is, what about the rights of those preborn women in the womb being exterminated?” said Rep. Dawn Keefer, R-York.
Opponents argued that parents should be allowed to make their own abortion decisions with medical input and by consulting their sources of spiritual advice.
“We have to be careful in this body that we don’t put an ideology on everybody and say that everybody has to live like this,” said Rep. Ed Gainey, D-Allegheny.
Planned Parenthood said the bill would make Pennsylvania’s abortion law among the nation’s most restrictive.
Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Montgomery, said a House that is “80 percent men and 0 percent physicians” should not be making decisions for women about terminating their pregnancies. She noted that a tiny fraction of abortions currently occur after 20 weeks.
The bill “does not protect women,” said Rep. Mary Jo Daley, D-Montgomery. “It attempts to control them by imposing the views of some legislators on women, and I think that’s wrong — that’s morally wrong.”
The legislation also would outlaw what the bill terms “dismemberment abortion,” a phrase not used by medical professionals. It would effectively ban dilation-and-evacuation, a procedure that is the most common method of second-trimester abortion.
“Dismemberment abortion is completely inhumane, it’s barbaric,” said Rep. Kristin Phillips-Hill, R-York.
Some opponents noted that the bill had not received public hearings, while supporters said the issues have been discussed in depth for years.
Wolf, a Democrat, called the bill an assault on the doctor-patient relationship and “cruel” because it lacks exceptions for rape or incest.
“These women deserve our support, not to be maligned by politicians in Harrisburg for making medical decisions about their bodies for their families with their doctors,” Wolf said in a written statement.
The bill passed the Senate in February by a 32-18 vote. The margins in both chambers raise doubts about whether supporters will be able to muster sufficient votes to override Wolf’s promised veto. Source House votes here
August 31, 2017
Southern Chester County News
Attorney General visits Kennett to wage war on opioid crisis
KENNETT SQUARE >> Determined to curb an opioid epidemic that is now the leading cause of death for all Americans under age 50, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro came to Kennett Square to discuss the crisis with state lawmakers, municipal officials and law enforcement officers.
“I need to know what’s happening on the ground and how my office can assist in the local efforts,” said Shapiro, who has visited eight counties in the past two days. “We need to have a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach to deal with the number one public health threat in Pennsylvania – the heroin and opioid epidemic. And these forums provide a great opportunity.”
The discussion, which coincided with International Overdose Awareness Day, took place at Kennett Fire Company’s Red Clay Room, and included almost the entire Chester County legislative delegation, state Rep. Steve Barrar, state Rep. John Lawrence, state Rep. Harry Lewis, state Rep. Becky Corbin, state Rep. Warren Kampf, and state Rep. Carolyn Comitta. Also in attendance were local police chiefs from throughout Chester County and Chester County Commissioners Kathi Cozzone and Terence Farrell.
“I can’t think of a family that hasn’t been affected by this,” said Barrar.
New Garden Police Chief Gerald Simpson said more efforts must be put into educating the younger set.
“We had five (opioid-related) deaths last year,” Simpson said. “If had five fatal accidents in one year, my community would be outraged and would ask me what I plan to do about it.”
Simpson said 25 percent of the opioid-related cases his department worked on last year resulted in death.
“That’s a scary number,” he said.
Shapiro told the panel that the crisis is taxing law enforcement and first responders in a significant way. He said police sometimes return to administer Narcan to the same person multiple times. There were 4,642 drug-related deaths in Pennsylvania last year, and if nothing is done, that number will skyrocket, he said.
Dinniman said he was glad to see Shapiro make the opioid crisis a priority.
“It was a productive and comprehensive discussion,” Dinniman said. “At the end of the day, solving the opioid crisis is not going to be a one-agency issue. Rather, it’s is going to take multi-pronged and cooperative effort between law enforcement personnel, public health officials, educators and others. And one of this morning’s overriding themes was how can we take what is working in Chester County and replicate it throughout the state.”
Shapiro cited his office’s and other local and state law enforcement departments’ efforts to crack down on illegal drug dealers amid the continued use and abuse of prescription medicine.
“We’ve arrested 844 drug dealers since I took office eight months ago. We could do that every day on and on, but at the end of the day it’s not going to solve it,” he said. “Prescription drugs are the root cause of so many of these problems.”
He also discussed efforts to deactivate and dispose of unwanted or unused prescription drugs, holding opioid manufacturers accountable, and working to improve access to addiction treatment and recovery options.
Cozzone expressed concerns about young people and students being prescribed opioids for sports injuries.
Dinniman discussed Senate Bill 535, legislation that calls for opioid awareness and addiction prevention education in Pennsylvania schools. That bill was incorporated in the Pennsylvania School Code, which recently passed the Senate.
Comitta, who said she plans to talk to the local medical community about the problem, said the roundtable discussion is a great start to eradicating the problem.
“We all need to put our heads together to figure out how to combat this very complicated, very distressing opioid epidemic,” Comitta said. “It’s multi-faceted and it will take every level of government and every level of law enforcement. This is a public health crisis.”
Lawrence said here is bipartisan support among local lawmakers to attack the opioid problem.
“There are a lot of callenges, but we are talking about people’s lives,” Lawrence said. “I can tell you there is a united front on this and we will move forward. It’s an issue that all of us are searching for solutions.”
Thursday morning’s discussion was one of several events involving combating opioid abuse in Chester County that day. Later that afternoon, Dinniman joined Shapiro to announce a series of roundtable discussions at Pennsylvania colleges and institutes of higher education aimed at addressing drug and alcohol abuse, mental health and sexual assault on campus. Source
320total visits,1visits today